What to Do if You Get Sick in College

Being sick in college is not the most pleasant of experiences. You likely have no one taking care of you, like you would  at home, while at the same time your responsibilities and obligations continue to pile up as youre stuck in bed. So just what are your options if you get sick in college? Let Your Professors Know If you are a student in a small class, have a big day in class (meaning you have a paper due or presentation to give), or have any other responsibilities where your absence will be both noted and problematic. A quick email letting your professor know youre sick while promising to follow-up with them about how to make up the assignment (including a gracious request for an extension), should only take a few minutes to write but will save you quite a bit of time later. Take Care of Yourself True, you have that midterm to take, a huge event your cultural club is planning, and the concert you and your roommate have had tickets for months. It may be frustrating, but you need to take care of yourself first and foremost. The last thing you need, after all, is to just get even sicker just  because you didnt take care of yourself. It may seem impossible at first, but there really are ways to get more sleep in college. Let yourself sleep! Healthy eating in college can be a challenge—but it also can be accomplished. Think of what your mother would want you to eat: fruits and veggies, things with nutrition, healthy liquids. Translation: no, a donut and a Diet Coke wont work for breakfast, especially when youre sick. Grab a banana, slice of toast, and orange juice instead. Sometimes, common over-the-counter medications like aspirin and DayQuil can make a bad cold or flu manageable. Dont be afraid to ask a friend or roommate to grab you something while theyre out and about! Get a Check-up at the Campus Health Center If youre sick for more than a day or two, have really bad symptoms, or otherwise just dont feel right, utilize what your campus has to offer. Make an appointment—or just walk in—to the campus health center. They can check you out while also offering advice and medication to get you back on your feet. Keep Checking in With Your Professors If youre missing a day of lecture in your chemistry class, you can usually grab notes from a friend or get them online. But if youre missing a few days, especially when theres intense material being covered or discussed, let your professor know whats going on. Tell your professor that youre really sick and  that you might need a little help catching up. Its much, much easier to be in touch early on than try to explain later why you havent been to class, havent been in touch, and havent turned in your assignments. Prioritize Your To-do List If youre sick for more than a day or two, you will likely fall behind on at least something—life in college moves very, very quickly. Take a few moments to write down a little list of what you have to do and then prioritize. Getting to the health center for a Strep Throat test? Priority! Updating Facebook with pictures from last weekends Halloween party? Not a priority. Take care of the most important things now so you can do the other things you want and need to do later. Major Illness or Extended Sick Time If your sick day or two turns into a major illness or youre sick for long enough that your academics suffer, you might need to take more drastic measures. Always Let Your Professors Know Whats Going On Even if you just shoot them a quick email letting them know that youve been really sick for a week and are trying to figure out whats going on, that email is much better than complete silence. Ask them what they need from you, if anything, to justify this much-missed class (a note from the health center? copies of your hospital paperwork?). Additionally, check your syllabi or ask your professors directly about what their policy is if youve missed something major, like a midterm or paper deadline. Check in With Your Campus Health Center If youre sick for more than a day or two, definitely go see the campus health center. On top of a check-up, they can verify with your professors that, indeed, you do have a nasty case of the flu and need to be out of class for another day or so. Keep the Faculty up to Date Check in with your academic adviser, an academic support office, the dean of students office, and/or the dean of faculty office. If youre missing a lot of class, are sick, and your academics are suffering, youll need some help from the campus administration. Dont worry, though: this doesnt mean youve done anything wrong. It just means youve been sick! And everyone from your adviser to the dean of faculty has dealt with sick students before. Life happens in college; people get sick. Just be smart about it and let the appropriate people know so that, as you begin to recover, you can have the support you need academically instead of having to stress  about your situation.

Speech On Banning Pit Bull Terriers - 937 Words

Student Name: Kinwen Foo Student ID: Gec000009f Unit task: VU21482 Task 1 1. Banning Pit Bull terriers. Hour alcohol can harm communities Wind forms Climate change Alpine logging 2. Wind power: In the past few years, resting on the research of the few scientists the latest argument states that wind power endangers the health of people. Wind turbines: Could be reason why bats die, a bat lung seems to have low pressure might cause to expand to the point of blood. 3. Alcohol Guidelines: Reducing the health risks. The life time risk harm from drinking alcohol increases with the amount consumed for healthy when and women drinking no more than two standard drinks on any day reduces the life time risk of harm from alcohol related disease or†¦show more content†¦No, this is not a good source of the evidence. It’s just the opinion of two people talking on a social media site like facebook. 25. Pit bulls should not be banned 26. It’s because they are dangerous dog 27. Cheryl compares dangerous dogs with the rights of Americans draws a connection to make dog look like a dangerous weapon. 28. Cheryl says that Pit-bulls are not pets as they injure people so badly that they need go to the hospital whereas pet is gentle friend, 29. Hewo thinks that Pit-bull dogs should not be banned. 30. License should be obtained who know how to train a sociable dog. 31.People need licenses to own respites and exotic. 32. Peaceful, violent and kill 33.The text is formal 34. No, they have opposite conflicting opinions. 35. Alcohol guidelines. 36. The student writes a source of information used and a small except of key information found. 37. The student writes a source of information used and a small except of the key information found. 38. The student writes a source of information used and a small except of the key information found. 39. Student writes the two or more different opinions in the issue research. 40. Alcohol has a complex role in Australian society. 41. The student will reference the information they found. Task 3 Key points of opinion 1 -Headaches -Sleep Problems -Learning disabilities in children -Ringing in the cars -Mood problems (Irritability, anxiety) -Concentration and memory problems -Issues withShow MoreRelatedInformative Speech On Pitbulls1055 Words   |  5 PagesDyana Churchill Communications 103 Informative Speech Outline 11 October 2017 Pit Bulls - How We Can Help Protect Them General Purpose: To inform Specific Purpose: To inform my audience about that pit bulls are not always dangerous and how they can be such a great companion. Introduction (Attention Gainer :) What is the first word that comes to mind when you think of pit bull? According to Cesar Millan, â€Å"A bread is like a suit of clothes, it doesnt tell you anything about the dog inside.† Cesar

Scarlet Letter †Pearl Character Analysis Free Essays

Pearl is a major character in the novel because she impacts everyone’s decisions in the book in some way. Though she is young throughout most of the novel, she acts older than most of the adults. With being the product of a sin, Pearl has to deal with a lot. We will write a custom essay sample on Scarlet Letter – Pearl Character Analysis or any similar topic only for you Order Now She defends herself and her mother from the cruel remarks of the town. Nathaniel Hawthorne uses the character, Pearl, as a symbol for a hint of happiness in the sadness and regret of a sin. Pearl, throughout the novel, is used as a main character and a symbol. Her presence in the book brings out the other main characters’ true character. She asks them questions they have to think hard about themselves. Pearl draws attention to their faults, such as what they are overlooking in their lives. She is portrayed as wiser than her years. The author wants her to seem more honest and more understanding than the adults in the novel. After Hester gets out of jail, Pearl is the only thing she has. â€Å"She named the infant â€Å"Pearl,† as being of great price- purchased with all she had- her mother’s only treasure!† (Hawthorne, 61) Her name means that she came at a â€Å"great price† to Hester, and she is all her mother has. Pearl is a victim of Hester sins. She has to deal with children and adults harassing her. Pearl is constantly referred to as a devil child in the book. Pearl is a living thing symbolizing the scarlet letter. Pearl is very perceptive to things around her. â€Å"Children will not abide any, the slightest, change in the accustomed aspect of things that are daily before their eyes. Pearl misses something that she has always seen me wear!† (Hawthorne, 144) Her mother decides to take her letter off, and Pearl notices. She was so used to seeing her mother with the letter, so she throws a temper tantrum. Pearl observes many things, like the way people act around her. In The Scarlet Letter, the author uses Pearl, as a symbol for happiness in the regret of a sin. She helps most of the adults learn more about themselves, and look deeper than on the surface. She makes them come out with their sins. She is a major character in the book because she touches everyone’s lives in some way. How to cite Scarlet Letter – Pearl Character Analysis, Essay examples

Research Ethics on Nuclear Testing Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Research Ethics on Nuclear Testing. Apnswer: Introduction The current international law establishment clearly sets out regulations and standards of nuclear testing as well as use of nuclear weapons. However, the law does not prohibit the testing and use of such weapons. It is for this reason that nuclear weapons are distinguished from biological as well as chemical weapons, armaments that are comprehensively banned as per the convention of 1972 Toxin and Bacteriological weapons and the Convention of Chemical Weapons of 1993 respectively (Baylis, 2017). The third Conference held from 8th to 9th 2014 December majorly focused on the legal gap and discussions on the Impact of nuclear weapons to humans. This gap was noted by the summary of Austria as well as the national pledge, and the desirability of prohibiting it. The most significant role played by Austria was the realization of the existence of both moral and ethical questions inn regard to nuclear weapons which surpass questions of law (Xuan et al., 2017). The ambivalence of law together with other general controversial life areas focuses deeply on human fundamental contradiction of the whole matter in question. Therefore, if international law gap highlighting nuclear weapons are to be eliminated, then their moral status should be the first thing to reflect upon. Up to this end and as per the focus of the whole subject, three reasons are thought out including just wart, consequentialism, and deontology. The purpose of the paper is to deliberate on the break with the security under which consequentialist discourse debates on nuclear weapons and how they are framed (Cole, 2017). Nuclear weapons should just be regarded the way they appear and not their purpose, with their moral status being assessed on how they course or inflict suffering (Rosario and Calsolari, 2017). Apart from abstracting and disconnecting them from realities of politics, such examinations brings out crucial questions of how and or whether law makers can be convinced that the singular inhumanity of nuclear weapons makes them unsafe and hence unethical to be used. Research Background Research ethics involve daily activity requirements, the safeguard of the subject dignity as well as the research information publications. When scientists participate in research, they always cope with values such as society and science which may conflict with subject value, societies, and communities and create dilemmas and tensions in nuclear testing (Coffman, Tran, Kip, Berlowitz and Chae, 2017). The current international law establishment clearly sets out regulations and standards of nuclear testing as well as use of nuclear weapons. However, the law does not prohibit the testing and use of such weapons. It is for this reason that nuclear weapons are distinguished from biological as well as chemical weapons, armaments that are comprehensively banned as per the convention of 1972 Toxin and Bacteriological weapons and the Convention of Chemical Weapons of 1993 respectively (Frankenburg, 2017). The third Conference held from 8th to 9th 2014 December majorly focused on the legal gap and discussions on the Impact of nuclear weapons to humans. This gap was noted by the summary of Austria as well as the national pledge, and the desirability of prohibiting it. The most significant role played by Austria was the realization of the existence of both moral and ethical questions inn regard to nuclear weapons which surpass questions of law (Pieterse and Pruim, 2017). The ambivalence of l aw together with other general controversial life areas focuses deeply on human fundamental contradiction of the whole matter in question. Therefore, if international law gap highlighting nuclear weapons are to be eliminated, then their moral status should be the first thing to reflect upon. Ethical Issues, Integrity, Safety and Risks Ethical issues concerning nuclear testing surround the ability of the nuclear power plants being in position to provide sufficient power, promotion of the economy of the nation involved, the essence of national defense. The backbone of nuclear testing and nuclear power generation squarely lies on either truth or lies. It all depends on the intention of the personnel at hand. Research has it that most nations carry out the nuclear testing on falsehood and the following forms part of the lies falsehood that the public is fed with. The public is kept behind news that nuclear power generation which happens after taking the plants through testing is a solution to the global warming (Granata, Oliveira, Little, Renner and Bishop,2017). That nuclear energy has nothing in connection with nuclear power. These are the main ethical issues that need an address by international communities and more importantly stakeholders of the deals. Considerations in nuclear testing which comes handy with nucl ear power should not be aimed at putting humanity at stake. The priority list of nuclear generation and further testing should be aimed at peace and sustainability for human development. There should not be any excuse about the integrity of the creation of nuclear power. Integrity should come first over arms as an industry that aims at mobilization of capital and the perpetuation of insecurity (Lee, Murfett and Udayan, 2017). The scared about human life in relation to other creation make up the development, the risks for use as well as the maintenance. Human life and that of other creation should override any other interest. The public which comprise of humanity is called upon to give the best directive in the search for security. Security should in any form override any goal in the process of nuclear power creation. The lies on the nuclear energy cycle should be put clear and on point (Larcos, Prgomet, Georgiou and Westbrook, 2017). It should be in the public domain that the nuclear energy cycle is the main producer of the greenhouse gases. It should be clear and on point that climate change is contributed heavily by the production of nuclear energy. Pros of Research It should be understood that during nuclear testing radioactive wastes and ways of disposal is the main challenge. The solution to the problem of nuclear power generation in conjunction with the testing has been ignored and in most cases the proponents claim that the solution would be found. The difference between low and high levels of radioactive wastes is also an issue that needs a solution (Quigley, Lowman and Wing, 2017). The scared about human life in relation to other creation make up the development, the risks for use as well as the maintenance. Cons Research Human life and that of other creation should override any other interest. The discussion for nuclear reactors wastes and weapons need a serious discussion. The knowledge that uranium wastes are left unattended to since the mining is carried out in remote areas should need attention (Winchester, Schmalfuss, Wymer, Helfrich and Beyt, 2017). The indigenous population also requires the security and safety from the hazardous uranium wastes. They are part of humanity. The point is that humanity need protection from nuclear related hazards above the consideration that nuclear energy vital in the forms stated earlier. Response Plan to the Issues and Risks The unethical nature of nuclear weapons, power and the whole nuclear fuel cycle is obvious in the current world just as the history narrates. Response plan to the issues and risks involves coming up with ways to reduce or do away with threats to research, and also opportunities to upsurge the impacts of nuclear testing. Researchers in the field of nuclear testing should work in ensuring that opportunities occur (Shariff et al., 2017). Likewise, the research is also responsible to reduce the probability and impacts of dangers and increase the possibility and impacts of prospects. For threats that cannot be alleviated, the research needs to have vigorous contingency plans and even the response plan should contingency fail in its operation. The research does not eliminate all risks of nuclear testing as resource and time are limited. Conclusion Nuclear power generation in connection with testing should be done in the manner that it addresses humanity positively. The benefits of nuclear power are many but important is looking at the negative impacts that come along with it. The integrity and security as well as the ethics should be put in consideration. The ways of waste management and the control of the nuclear power should in any way form the framework for the nuclear test (Ornek, Acar, Acar, Ozdemir, Atilgan, Yumusak and Ozgermen, 2017). No objective should override human life and other creations in the environment. Public participation in the process should be part of the agenda in the nuclear testing process. Bibliography Baylis, F., 2017. Human Nuclear Genome Transfer (So?Called Mitochondrial Replacement): Clearing the Underbrush.Bioethics,31(1),pp.7-19. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Baylis%2C+F.%2C+2017.+Human+Nuclear+Genome+Tr.btnG=hl=enas_sdt=0%2C5as_ylo=2017 Cole, L., 2017. Bio-Weapons Testing: History, Ethics, and Values.Prehospital and Disaster Medicine,32(S1), pp.S7-S7. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Cole%2C+L.%2C+2017.+Bio-Weapons+Testing%3A+History%2C+Ethics%2C+and+Values.+Prehospital+and+Disaster+Medicine%2C+32%28S1%29%2C+pp.S7-S7.btnG=hl=enas_sdt=0%2C5as_ylo=2017 Coffman, J., Tran, T., Kip, K., Berlowitz, M.S. and Chae, S.H., 2017. Consultation to a Cardiologist Prior to Low Risk Procedures Generates Excessive Testing and Cost Without Affecting Outcomes in Patients with Stable Ischemic Heart Disease. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Coffman%2C+J.%2C+Tran%2C+T.%2C+Kip%2C+K.%2C+Berlowitz%2C+M.S.+and+Chae%2C+S.H.%2C+2017. Frankenburg, F.R., 2017. In November 1986, Massachusetts congressman Ed Markey released a report titled American Nuclear Guinea Pigs: Three Decades of Radiation Experiments on US Citizens that describes 31 human radiation experiments involving nearly 700 people. This report received little coverage, and the Department of Energy (DOE) did not follow Markeys recommendations to locate the subjects to compensate them. Journalist Eileen.Human Medical Experimentation: From Smallpox Vaccines to Secret Government Programs, p.289. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Human+Medical+Experimentation%3A+From+Smallpox+Vaccines+to+Secret+Government+Programs%2C+p.289.+btnG=hl=enas_sdt=0%2C5as_ylo=2017 Granata, C., Oliveira, R.S., Little, J.P., Renner, K. and Bishop, D.J., 2017. Sprint-interval but not continuous exercise increases PGC-1 protein content and p53 phosphorylation in nuclear fractions of human skeletal muscle.Scientific Reports,7, p.44227. Larcos, G., Prgomet, M., Georgiou, A. and Westbrook, J., 2017. A work observation study of nuclear medicine technologists: interruptions, resilience and implications for patient safety.BMJ Qual Saf,26(6), pp.466-474. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Larcos%2C+G.%2C+Prgomet%2C+M.%2C+Georgiou%2C+A.+and+Westbrook%2C+J.%2C+2017. 2017 Lee, A.Y.S., Murfett, L. and Udayan, R.A.Y., 2017. Comparison of the prevalence of antinuclear antibody and subserology in urban and rural settings.Archives of Rheumatology,32(1), pp.086-088. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Coffman%2C+J.%2C+Tran%2C+T.%2C+Kip%2C+K.%2C+Berlowitz%2C+M.S.+and+Chae%2C+S.H.%2C+2017. Ornek, F., Acar, D.E., Acar, U., Ozdemir, O., Atilgan, H.I., Yumusak, N. and Ozgermen, B.B., 2017. Short-and long-term effects of zinc treatment on lacrimal gland histopathology and tear functions tests in radioiodine-administered rats.Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia,80(1), pp.35-40. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?.+Arquivos+Brasileiros+de+Oftalmologia%2C+80%281%29%2C+pp.35-40.btnG=hl=enas_sdt=0%2C5as_ylo=2017 Pieterse, H. and Pruim, J., 2017. Good Clinical Practices in (Nuclear) Research. InQuality in Nuclear Medicine(pp. 23-57). Springer International Publishing. Quigley, D., Lowman, A. and Wing, S. eds., 2017.Tortured science: Health studies, ethics and nuclear weapons in the United States. Routledge. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Human+Medical+Experimentation%3A+From+Smallpox+Vaccines+to+Secret+Government+Programs%2C+p.289.+btnG=hl=enas_sdt=0%2C5as_ylo=2017 Rosario, P.W. and Calsolari, M.R., 2017. Importance of cytological subclassification of thyroid nodules with Bethesda category III cytology (AUS/FLUS) into architectural atypia only and nuclear atypia: A prospective study.Diagnostic Cytopathology. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Baylis%2C+F.%2C+2017.+Human+Nuclear+Genome+Tr.btnG=hl=enas_sdt=0%2C5as_ylo=2017 Shariff, M.I., Kim, J.U., Ladep, N.G., Gomaa, A.I., Crossey, M.M., Okeke, E., Banwat, E., Waked, I., Cox, I.J., Williams, R. and Holmes, E., 2017. The Plasma and Serum Metabotyping of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Nigerian and Egyptian Cohort using Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Coffman%2C+J.%2C+Tran%2C+T.%2C+Kip%2C+K.%2C+Berlowitz%2C+M.S.+and+Chae%2C+S.H.%2C+2017. Winchester, D.E., Schmalfuss, C., Wymer, D.C., Helfrich, C.D. and Beyth, R.J., 2017. Feasibility of Audit and Feedback for Reducing Rarely Appropriate Nuclear Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Among Veterans. Xuan, W.B., Wang, F.X., Zhou, L.J., Wang, T., Chen, J., Lei, Z.Q. and Yang, H., 2017. Research on Full-Scale Hydrostatic Burst Testing of Different Pipeline Girth Weld Defects. InApplied Mechanics and Materials(Vol. 853, pp. 351-355). Trans Tech Publications. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Larcos%2C+G.%2C+Prgomet%2C+M.%2C+Georgiou%2C+A.+and+Westbrook%2C+J.%2C+2017. 2017